Three bishops from Manicaland and one from Bulawayo told United States embassy officials in separate conversations on 16 April 2003 that they had drawn up a 10-point vision for Zimbabwe and were quietly approaching the President’s office to arrange negotiations between the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front and the Movement for Democratic Change.
The four were Sebastian Bakare bishop of the Anglican Church in Manicaland, Trevor Manhanga of the Evangelical Fellowship of Zimbabwe, Patrick Mutume of the Catholic Church in Mutare and Pius Ncube Archbishop of Bulawayo.
Though the Bishops did not provide a written copy of the vision statement, they reported that it called for political depolarization, demilitarization, disbanding of the youth militia, non-partisan treatment within the courts, inclusiveness in the political process, and repeal of the draconian Public Order and Security Act and Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
Full cable:
Viewing cable 03HARARE801, BISHOPS SPEARHEAD DISCREET GOZ – MDC MEDIATION
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID |
Created |
Released |
Classification |
Origin |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 HARARE 000801
SIPDIS
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR J. FRAZER
LONDON FOR C. GURNEY
PARIS FOR C. NEARY
NAIROBI FOR T. PFLAUMER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/01/2013
SUBJECT: BISHOPS SPEARHEAD DISCREET GOZ – MDC MEDIATION
INITIATIVE
REF: A. HARARE 540
¶B. HARARE 222
Classified By: Political Officer Audu Besmer for reasons 1.5 b/d
Summary:
——–
¶1. (C) Three bishops in Manicaland, and one Archbishop in
Bulawayo, are spearheading an effort to arrange talks between
the GOZ and the MDC focused on resolving Zimbabwe’s political
crisis. They envision a depolarized, demilitarized Zimbabwe
where the rule of law is upheld, but they are only seeking to
establish common ground and points of contention between the
GOZ and MDC as a starting point for talks. They have
consulted with GOZ officials, MDC leadership, and South
African government officials. Although this effort alone
might be insufficient to forge a political settlement, a
combination of this initiative with other elements of
international and domestic pressure, might be enough to force
Mugabe to the negotiating table. End Summary.
Bishops Draw up a Vision for Zimbabwe
————————————-
¶2. (C) In separate conversations with Poloff on April 16, the
Bishop of the Anglican Church in Manicaland and President of
the Zimbabwe Council of Churches (ZCC) Sebastian Bakare and
Bishop Trevor Manhanga, President of the Evangelical
Fellowship of Zimbabwe (EFZ), revealed that together with
Bishop Patrick Mutume of the Roman Catholic Church in Mutare,
and President of the Catholic Commission for Justice and
Peace and Catholic Archbishop of Bulawayo Pius Ncube they
have drawn up a ten-point vision for Zimbabwe and are quietly
approaching the President’s office to arrange negotiations
between ZANU-PF and the MDC. Though the Bishops did not
provide a written copy of the vision statement, they reported
that it calls for political depolarization, demilitarization,
disbanding of the youth militia(s), non-partisan treatment
within the courts, inclusiveness in the political process,
and repeal of the draconian Public Order and Security Act
(POSA) and Access to Information and Protection of Privacy
Act (AIPPA).
Parties to Set Agenda
———————
¶3. (C) Bakare said they would not set the agenda for
negotiations but rather seek to find common ground and points
of contention as a starting point for the parties to move
into substantive talks. Bakare said their initiative comes
out of deep resentment within churches that the GOZ has
prevented them from distributing food and other social
services that they once did and could again provide. Bakare
said their intent is to be an honest broker. They draw
church members from both political parties and have a moral
responsibility to use their good offices to resolve the
crisis.
Increased Church Advocacy
————————-
¶4. (C) Bakare said that in comparison to various church and
church associations’ public statements, for example the March
2003 Lenten Pastoral Letter by the Zimbabwe Catholic Bishops’
Conference (ZCBC) – a scathing attack on the GOZ for
politicizing food distribution and access to justice, and for
promoting political violence – this initiative was an
additional dimension of church activism (Refs A, B).
Regional Connections
——————–
¶5. (C) Bakare said that Anglican Archbishop of Capetown
Njongonkulu Ndungane had offended local bishops during his
February 2003 trip to Harare by not consulting with them
beforehand. Instead his meetings and his public remarks
suggested he had been taken in by Mugabe’s charm and
rhetoric. Ndungane’s second visit in March was better, as he
met with a broader spectrum of Zimbabwean society, including
church and civic groups, but according to Bakare, the damage
was already done. Bakare acknowledged that – given the
access Ndungane has been given to the President – it might be
advantageous for the two initiatives to join, yet he still
seemed personally offended by Ndungane’s missteps. Manhanga
believed that it would be important for them to join with
Ndungane and suggested he could convince Bakare. Manhanga
also said he had consulted with South African government
officials, including Director-General in the Presidency
Reverend Frank Chikane, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs
Aziz Pahad, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in
Parliament Paulo Jordan and South African bishops. They
intended to lobby more broadly within SADC – and with the
Kenyan Government – to press for inter-party dialogue within
Zimbabwe.
Likely Participants
——————-
¶6. (C) Bakare said their group consisted of roughly 10-12
Zimbabwean bishops from every denomination and locality.
While they had been requesting a meeting with the President
for a month now to start the process, they had already met
with some GOZ officials and received indications that ZANU-PF
spokesman and elder statesman Nathan Shamuyarira and Minister
of Special Affairs and ZANU-PF National Chairman John Nkomo
might be tapped to represent the GOZ in negotiations. On the
MDC side, they have an open relationship with MDC President
Morgan Tsvangirai and have also met Shadow Minister of
Justice and MP David Coltart. Both are open to this
initiative.
ZANU-PF Sincere?
—————-
¶7. (C) Asked whether they thought the GOZ would take
negotiations seriously and why, Bakare said that they would,
that hardship was now affecting even the families of Mugabe’s
inner circle who no longer deny the existence of a crisis
privately. Manhanga said that travel bans and financial
sanctions were also biting.
Comment:
——–
¶8. (C) That the bishops have not yet succeeded in getting a
meeting with President Mugabe does not bode well for the
prospects for success of this initiative. However, the
bishops’ initiative can be one key element in growing
international pressure on the Mugabe regime. Church
pressure, tough nudging from Presidents Muluzi and Mbeki,
travel bans and financial sanctions, and Zimbabwe’s economic
implosion might, in the end, be enough to force Mugabe to the
negotiating table. End Comment.
SULLIVAN
(58 VIEWS)