Mliswa calls for amendment of Zimbabwe Constitution to stop recalling of MPs

I run an organisation called Youth Advocacy Reform and Democracy (YARD) where I invite young people from political parties.  I created it when I could see that politics in the youth was too much.  We have no constitution, we run by objectives.  The only way we agree is through a consensus because I believe the young people in YARD have got the capacity.  They are educated and why can they not reason?  If you believe this is black, convince the others that it is black and that becomes a way of life in many ways.

You say you champion reform over rule – I too generally prefer evolution to revolution but to push the matter further, sometimes evolution leads to the birth of a new species.  I am a little bit sceptical that the Whips really have changed as much as you say they have, especially given the spate of recent claims about the bullying.  This is important because political parties Chief Whips are now known for bullying rather than pushing the welfare of Member of Parliament.  They are now known for having more cars and pushing for their own benefits and not Members of Parliament.  If you are not right, then the only reason we do not need to abolish the whip is that it has effectively abolished itself.  If that is the case, let us make it official.  Words and symbolism matter. So, drop the word and rename the whips office.  I would like the whips office to be named Members Coordination and support because that is what their job is.  So the word chief whip must not be there because it is coersive.  Rather than simply trusting, the bad old days of the whip are gone.  Now will be a good time to cement positive changes you say have occurred while getting rid of the last of the prefect bullying that should remain.

This reformed office must however make sure it is concerned more with the party unity.  Most chief whips come here but their party is divided.  There is more factionalism and they must also deal with that because most of them do not seem to understand the effects and its united party or party which a faction has to be one representing national interest or else it will be one more hang over from the already absolute two party system.  In the post chief whip era there has to be more scope for cooperating across the bench rather than keeping the gap between them as wide as possible.  We believe that if we do not talk to each other we are making progress.  I would love to see Members of the ruling party talking to Members of the opposition on an idea, same thing members of the opposition going there but we seem to want to keep the distance and we believe in it growing bigger and bigger.  Can we walk through the lobby together on this one, I ask of Parliamentarians.  Can we be together the same way that we walk into this House when we are opening? Can we be able to do that?  An astute political manoeuvre where Frank Underwood says “either I give ground or to be seen as a hypocrite over my desire for a consensus.”

I am of course only kidding and gratefully accept any opportunity to take up residence in any grey area rather than accept the false binary and yes or no referendum that are imposed.  I certainly do not think that the culture surrounding the whips has changed completely.  Rather it is changing due to necessity and changing due to necessity is that slowly Members of Parliament are becoming vocal and they are pushing for strong values and they are advocating.  This usually happens towards the end of Parliament.  You saw that historically when the President was impeached, Hon. Maridadi had moved the motion and I was seconding it but it was never accepted though it was there.  When the time came to then unite, there was a meeting of minds where Hon. Sen. Mutsvangwa would then move the motion and would be seconded by Hon. Maridadi.

Continued next page

(312 VIEWS)