Mliswa calls for amendment of Zimbabwe Constitution to stop recalling of MPs

That said, those men and women who served in the Whip’s office in the past, much as I agree with their mercies deserve to be consigned there. Motivations that were deeply felt and even noble – they believed in the calls of their parties.  It is important.  The Chief Whips believed in the calls of their parties.  If you also believe that you do not believe in the calls of your party, they will be able to point you out.  That is why I think parliamentarians in this country make a mistake and are going to hold the elections under a party name.  The moment that you go under a party name, you are subjected to the party rules, party’s dirty tricks as well and constitution – this is not good.

It is important that when you are going towards elections, that nomination court is signed by a party person.  When I was Chairman of Mashonaland West Province, I would sign; it was ZANU PF then.  My reference to the congress is an acknowledgement that too many members seek only what optimistic deals they can get for their districts in times of partisan deadlock and not for the party or the country.  Now, we have got politics of people feeding themselves.  It is no longer for the party.  You see Cabinet Ministers here – are they serving the Government, party or themselves?  We now have more Cabinet Ministers becoming rich everyday because they have now forgotten why they are in those positions.  They do not even care about the party.  Being here as a Cabinet Minister, is representing your party but they are undermining the sanity of this Parliament – the mandate it has.  They have disrespected this Parliament because they are no longer about anything; they are about opportunistic deals that they can get for themselves.  That is what it has been reduced to.

Moreover, stories from the whip’s office now testify to its more professional human resource role – delaying with more pressing domestic and even emotional struggles.  Chief Whips – when we come to Parliament we have issues.  Do you have offices that can accommodate us and do you have time for us?  Do you have a person in your office that can counsel because you may manage people but you must find the personnel to be able to do that?  We have problems when we come here.  Some would have driven without fuel and when they get here, they do not know how to get back. We had a situation last week when there was no fuel for Member of Parliament to go back home and now what happens?  How did they get home?  When it is time for you to talk to them, you are not seen.  You only meet when you want your way but you are not there when it is to do with their welfare.  That must certainly change at the end of the day.

Dealing with the workplace domestic or even emotional struggle – I am not saying that the whip and the stick have been replaced with kittens licking Members of Parliament into submission, but it is an indication that whatever form it takes, politics still requires collaboration between Members and a structure through which to do it.  There must be collaboration.  No wonder why people win through structures – that is collaboration.  British theme attached to the adversarial rough and tumble of polarised debate but it seems to me our exchange might provide an opportunity to model an alternative.  Can we get beyond a yes or no answer to our question and find some kind of consensus?  A consensus is critical when you have national interest and it is key.

Continued next page

(312 VIEWS)