Mliswa calls for amendment of Zimbabwe Constitution to stop recalling of MPs

Businesses have been turning their backs on that sort of structural rigidity.  Parliament seems stuck with an almost Victorian system of prefects, house masters and matrons just as head teachers did a worse not a better job when empowered with caning.  The good work you see done by the whips will be better done without threat of a lash.  So, you see kids being whipped with a whip but here they do not do that.

The need to get business done should not be confused with the desire to marshal troops along party lines which is an optical to productivity policy making.  The claim that Americans would welcome whips is old given that the problem with congress at the moment is precisely that it is too partisan already.  You can see that American politics is now cracking because it has become partisan.  America is now losing its ideology of ‘one America, we love America and God bless America’.  It is a good example as we now know that it is partisan politics.  Good Bills which are good for health care and infrastructure, people do not vote. Now you need to be the majority to be able to do that.

As much as I appreciate correction of the dark arts, it seems you are excessively downplaying the disciplinarian nature of the whipping system.  Too many Members of Parliament (MPs) have reported on the strong arm cohesion and even bullying of whips over decades for us to dismiss them.  MPs are constantly complaining; if the Chief Whip did not know that – I am telling you today that these are bullying tactics and we are coerced into making decisions.  I have always said that after a rally, if you want to see if it was a good rally or not, you must listen to the women who are now speaking going home after a rally not when they are there.  When they are there they sing for you – after that they will say ‘he just gathered us there and did not give us food.  He did not even leave a cent and he is getting into his car’.  To me, it is important –[HON. MEMBRES: Inaudible interjections.]-  This is research.  The claim that Americans would one day see a partisan thing; much as I appreciate correction, too many MPs have reported on the strong arm like I have said, and a strong arm is an arm which must be adjusted.  It is correct of course that the threat of lash has no place in modern parliamentary affairs and a comparison with today’s other work place.  Environment is apt – any attempt to coerce a colleague through bullying or blackmail will rightly be condemned and those same standards deserve to apply to Westminister. This Parliament too must be able to do that.  Members of Parliament must be free to exercise their rights.  Members of Parliament must be free to speak out, not for them to be asked afterwards – why did you say this?

Thankfully, the days of strong arm of coercion are becoming memories.  No longer would you find the safe in the Chief Whip’s office containing the infamous notebooks of Members’ follies and flows done away.  This is the Tories official “sheet list”.  All night sittings are gone.  There are social hours, crèche facilities, human resources and so on.  It is critical.  This is important for this Parliament to understand that there must be facilities. Today, women who have babies have a right to be in this Parliament but there must be a crèche which looks after those children.

This is the modern day of politics that we are talking about and that becomes more important. Many MPs may miss the rough and tumble age but it is a welcome evolution.  That is why I champion reform over ruling.  It is about reform over ruling.  To me, reform is more important than ruling and we are always asking ourselves in the political parties, that is this reform or it is ruling?  Are the generations to come going to say this is ruling or reform?  We have that challenge and task of ensuring that we reform for other generations to also be part of this country.

Continued next page

(313 VIEWS)