The Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front surprised everyone in the 2005 parliamentary elections including itself when it won 78 of the 120 contested seats garnering a two-thirds majority which enabled it to change even the country’s constitution.
To make matters worse, even though the electoral conditions were not right everyone, including the Zimbabwe Election Supervisory Network agreed that the voting had been free.
ZESN said there were “serious implications on the credibility of the electoral process” but polling day was calm and peaceful and citizens “had the opportunity to exercise their right to vote and were free to do so”.
The Movement for Democratic Change which had been confident of victory with Bulawayo mayor saying at worst they would win 70 seats, only won 41 seats, 16 less than in the previous elections.
Full cable:
Viewing cable 05HARARE509, TAINTED ELECTION GIVES ZANU-PF 2/3 MAJORITY,
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID |
Created |
Released |
Classification |
Origin |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 HARARE 000509
SIPDIS
AF/S FOR B. NEULING
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR C. COURVILLE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/31/2010
SUBJECT: TAINTED ELECTION GIVES ZANU-PF 2/3 MAJORITY,
REGIONAL BLESSING
REF: (A) HARARE 502 (B) HARARE 501 (C) HARARE 492
Classified By: Ambassador Christopher W. Dell under Section 1.4 b/d
——-
Summary
——-
¶1. (U) In the wake of the March 31 elections, Zimbabwe’s new
Parliament will include 108 MPs from ZANU-PF (including 30
appointees), 41 from the MDC, and one independent, Jonathan
Moyo. Despite the MDC,s claims that the results were
rigged, the South African, SADC and AU observer missions
have, as expected, blessed the results, casting the election
as reflective of the “free will of the people,” although not
without caveats and internal dissension. An initial
assessment by local non-governmental election watchdog
Zimbabwe Election Support Network (ZESN), however, has been
much more critical, highlighting myriad flaws and urging
serious investigation of discrepancies in the vote tallies.
END SUMMARY.
—————————-
ZANU-PF 78 (plus 30), MDC 41
—————————-
¶2. (U) The final polling results released by the Zimbabwe
Election Commission late on April 1 gave President Robert
Mugabe’s ZANU-PF 78 seats (not including the 30 seats to be
appointed by Mugabe under the Constitution), the opposition
MDC 41, and independent candidate Jonathan Moyo one. The
results indicate a net loss of 16 seats for the MDC from
their showing in 2000, five of which had already been lost in
tainted by-elections since 2000 and three of which were
effectively lost when the GOZ gerrymandered three urban MDC
constituencies out of existence before the election. Moyo’s
seat was also at the MDC’s expense. In one of the more
surprising results, ZANU-PF took the seat held comfortably by
ZANU-Ndonga since independence.
—————————————-
South African Observer Mission Whitewash
—————————————-
¶3. (U) The weekend saw the initial battery of international
assessments of Zimbabwe’s elections. In a statement (text
faxed to AF/S) read on April 2 by delegation leader Minister
of Labor Membathisi Mdladlana, the South African Observer
Mission concluded that the elections reflected “the will of
the people.” Without discussing the pre-election
environment, the statement described improvements since 2000
and 2002 elections and concluded that the elections complied
with the Zimbabwean law, which “by and large” conformed to
SADC guidelines. In a combative exchange with the press
after reading the statement, Mdladlana said that the various
complaints about the election’s conduct either occurred
outside the observation of his mission or would be for
relevant Zimbabwean election institutions to address in the
future.
————–
SADC Whitewash
————–
¶4. (C) Echoing the South African Government’s assessment,
the SADC delegation issued a statement on April 3 that also
concluded that the elections had expressed the will of the
people. The statement at least took note of numerous flaws
in the election environment but the spokesperson of the
observer mission asserted that they did not prevent voters
from casting their ballots secretly and freely. A British
diplomat told us that the Mauritian Vice-Chair of the
delegation had told her that he strongly disagreed with the
mission’s assessment but had to go along after conferring
with President Berenger’s office. At the press conference,
which had been delayed a day, the SADC spokesperson
acknowledged MDC complaints but, echoing the South Africans,
advised that those complaints would have to be pursued by the
relevant Zimbabwean election institutions.
———————————–
African Union Qualified Endorsement
———————————–
¶5. In a statement (faxed to AF/S) received by the Embassy
April 4, the African Union concluded that “at the point of
the ballot,” voters could “freely choose their preferred
candidates by casting a secret ballot.” The statement
commended the election’s non-violence and GOZ steps toward
“creating an even playing field” but urged attention to the
problems of voter turn-away, assisted voting, and the
passivity of party polling agents. Finally, it urged the ZEC
and Electoral Supervisory Commission to investigate MDC
allegations of serious discrepancies in the official results.
——————————————— —–
ZESN Highlights Flaws, Urges Further Investigation
——————————————— —–
¶6. (U) In a statement released April 4 (e-mailed to AF/S),
ZESN publicized a host of flaws in the election’s conduct,
including its underlying legal framework, the integrity of
the ZEC, the electoral court’s independence, the poor state
of the voters’ rolls, administration of postal voting, media
access, and intimidation of voters, and transparency of the
tabulation process. ZESN asserted that discrepancies between
the announced number of ballots cast and the number finally
recorded (reftels) had “serious implications on the
credibility of the electoral process” and urged the ZEC to
investigate. The statement did close with the observation
that polling day was calm and peaceful and that citizens “had
the opportunity to exercise their right to vote and were free
to do so.”
——-
Comment
——-
¶7. (C) A 2/3 parliamentary majority, cowed domestic reaction
(for now), and a regional blessing ) so far this election
has fulfilled all of the ruling party’s principal objectives.
Whether it will also lead to renewed international
legitimacy, however, is much less likely.
Dell
(61 VIEWS)
Pingback: Jonathan Moyo according to Wikileaks-Part Nine | The Insider