But they had all deserted the original MDC led by Morgan Tsvangirai with Ncube and Coltart leaving in 2006 and Biti in 2014.
They were all, therefore, rescued from political doldrums by Chamisa last year.
So are their arguments against the Supreme Court ruling that Chamisa’s leadership of the MDC is illegitimate based on legal opinion or self-preservation?
What is your take?
If you are a lawyer please send your opinion to: charlesrukuni@insiderzim.com
(269 VIEWS)
A friend who knows about my legal battle with Zimbabwe’s richest man, Strive Masiyiwa, way…
Britain says amendment of the Zimbabwe constitution is a sovereign, legislative matter for Zimbabwe to…
It is now 47 years since I wrote the short story below for a South…
Zimbabwe has released its 2026 monetary policy statement in which it seeks to stabilise its…
Far from it, on paper that is. Ignatius Chombo was one of the longest serving…
Zimbabwe on Thursday announced a ZiG290.9 billion budget with revenue expected to be ZiG287.6 billion,…
View Comments
Biti and Ncube were rebels and the judgement makes them stand to loose if the MDC follows the judgement.