Categories: Stories

Why tax cuts for the rich solve nothing

One might get away with this in the case of personal income tax, because even if the losers notice, they are not sufficiently organized.

By contrast, even small businesses in the United States lobby Congress.

Most economists would agree that America’s current tax structure is inefficient and unfair.

Some firms pay a far higher rate than others.

Perhaps innovative firms that create jobs should be rewarded, in part, by a tax break.

But the only rhyme or reason to who gets tax breaks appears to be the effectiveness of supplicants’ lobbyists.

One of the most significant problems concerns taxation of US corporations’ foreign-earned income.

Democrats believe that, because US corporations, wherever they operate, benefit from America’s rule of law and power to ensure that they are not mistreated (often guaranteed by treaty), they ought to pay for these and other advantages.

But a sense of fairness and reciprocity, much less national loyalty, is not deeply ingrained in many US companies, which respond by threatening to move their headquarters abroad.

Republicans, partly out of sensitivity to this threat, advocate a territorial tax system, like that used in most countries: taxes should be imposed on economic activity only in the country where it occurs.

The concern is that, after imposing a one-off levy on the untaxed profits that US firms hold abroad, introducing a territorial system would generate a tax loss.

To offset this, Paul Ryan, the speaker of the US House of Representatives, has proposed adding a tax on net imports (imports minus exports).

Because net imports lead to job destruction, they should be discouraged.

At the same time, so long as US net imports are as high as they are now, the tax would raise enormous revenues.

But there’s the rub: the money must come from someone’s pocket.

Import prices will go up.

Consumers of cheap clothing from China will be worse off.

To Trump’s team, this is collateral damage, the inevitable price that must be paid to give America’s plutocrats more money.

But retailers such as Walmart, not just its customers, are part of the collateral damage, too.

Continued next page

(99 VIEWS)

This post was last modified on %s = human-readable time difference 6:41 pm

Page: 1 2 3

Charles Rukuni

The Insider is a political and business bulletin about Zimbabwe, edited by Charles Rukuni. Founded in 1990, it was a printed 12-page subscription only newsletter until 2003 when Zimbabwe's hyper-inflation made it impossible to continue printing.

Recent Posts

The Zimbabwe government and not saboteurs sabotaging ZiG

The Zimbabwe government’s insatiable demand for money to satisfy its own needs, which has exceeded…

October 20, 2024

The Zimbabwe Gold will regain its value if the government does this…

Economist Eddie Cross says the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG) will regain its value if the government…

October 16, 2024

Is Harare the least democratic province in Zimbabwe?

Zimbabwe’s capital, Harare, which is a metropolitan province, is the least democratic province in the…

October 11, 2024

Zimbabweans against extension of presidential term in office

Nearly 80% of Zimbabweans are against the extension of the president’s term in office, according…

October 11, 2024

Zimbabwe government biggest loser when there is a discrepancy in the exchange rate

The government is the biggest loser when there is a discrepancy between the official exchange…

October 10, 2024

What is wrong with Zimbabwe? It’s not the economy but the government and its leadership

Zimbabwe is currently in turmoil after it devalued its five-month old currency, the Zimbabwe Gold…

October 1, 2024