Categories: Stories

Why social distancing is not sustainable in most African countries

The story below does not mention Zimbabwe but most of the facts that apply to the African countries mentioned apply to Zimbabwe. In fact, Zimbabwe is much more vulnerable because its economy is largely run by the informal sector.

African countries have joined the rest of the world in imposing severe restrictions on human mobility in a bid to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.

With the rapid rise of infection rates—which approached 1.3 million globally and 8 000 in Africa as of this writing (9 April)—social distancing and other public health measures are crucial for reducing further contagion.

The immediate focus of policymakers on improving the capacity of health care systems to test, isolate, and treat patients has been appropriate considering the millions of lives at risk.

At the same time though, social distancing restrictions have disrupted the livelihoods of tens of millions, exposing vast populations to an acute financial shock.

Many countries, such as Nigeria and Cameroon, have introduced strict lockdown measures that closed business without sufficient mitigation measures to assist the affected individuals and households.

For the poor without the luxury of bank savings or a resort to credit cards, public health measures that cut their lifeline of daily income could appear to offer a cure that is as bad as the sickness.

Such measures, then, will also be highly ineffective, as people are more likely to disobey the law rather than stay at home and go hungry. Given these devastating potential consequences, it is ethically questionable to bar people from working without offering a means to support their basic needs.

Thankfully, Africa’s agrarian households—which make up more than half of the total population—will be comparatively insulated from potential food shortages as they produce most of their own consumption needs.

A disadvantage in normal times due to its low productivity, subsistence farming offers the benefit of self-reliance, shielding farmers from the immediate costs of trade restrictions induced by COVID-19.

Likewise, paid urban workers, most of whom work for the government or state enterprises, will face limited financial crises unless the provision of food supplies becomes severely strained or inflation skyrockets.

Continued next page

(156 VIEWS)

Don't be shellfish... Please SHARE
Google
Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin
Email
Print

This post was last modified on April 11, 2020 10:54 am

Page: 1 2

Charles Rukuni

The Insider is a political and business bulletin about Zimbabwe, edited by Charles Rukuni. Founded in 1990, it was a printed 12-page subscription only newsletter until 2003 when Zimbabwe's hyper-inflation made it impossible to continue printing.

Recent Posts

ZiG continues to hold its own

The Zimbabwe Gold, ZiG, continued to firm against the United States dollar ending the week…

May 17, 2024

Zimbabwe requires 46 000 tonnes of grain a month to feed those without food

Zimbabwe will be issuing 7.5 kg of grain a month to each of the six…

May 16, 2024

Stability of ZiG critical to reduce demand for use of US dollar

The stability of Zimbabwe’s local currency, the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG), is critical if the country…

May 15, 2024

More than half Zimbabwe population will need food aid

More than half of Zimbabwe’s population will need food aid between this month and March…

May 15, 2024

ZiG kicks off week on a positive note

Zimbabwe’s currency, the ZiG, kicked off the week on a positive note after firming to…

May 13, 2024

Why Zimbabwe white farmers lost their R2 billion land damages claim in South Africa

Twenty-five white Zimbabwean farmers who took their R2 billion land damages claim to the South…

May 12, 2024