Mr. Speaker, there was raised concern that this Bill did not get support from Cabinet as evidenced by sentiments expressed by other Cabinet Members through the media. I surely do not find that to be an issue that stops this amendment process as disagreements will always be part of our deep seated democratic principles. Just like here in Parliament, we are witnessing divergent views on one issue and if that happens in here, what is irregular in that happening in Cabinet especially in view of the democratic mechanisms in place to ensure that the voice of the majority wins the day. After all, there is a long standing tradition of ‘Cabinet collective responsibility’ that dictates that even when a Cabinet Member does not agree with the majority decision, it is either that they are bound by that decision or they resign.
The fact that we have not seen any resignation arising from the successful endorsement of this Bill by Cabinet is eloquent testimony that the Bill has full backing of Government and the final arbiters, the people, through their elected representatives who will have the final say on the Bill. Mr. Speaker, that said, I now propose that the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 1) Bill [H.B. 1, 2017] be now read a second time.
(858 VIEWS)
This post was last modified on June 14, 2017 1:43 pm
There is now a glimmer of hope for the octogenarian plot holders from Irene Farm…
Zimbabwe has moved 10 notches up on the world press freedom index from 116 last…
People must not talk ill about the dead.Tradition says so. But we are not talking…
Cases of corrupt business people getting close to the Head of State to give an…
Zion Christian Church leader Bishop Nehemiah Muitendi delivered a powerful, thought provoking sermon on Easter…
Zimbabwe First Lady Auxillian Mnangagwa will be questioned about the continued detention of journalist Blessed…