Categories: Stories

Why men and women lie about sex

Men have more casual partners, regardless of the validity of their report.

Studies have found that on average, women report fewer nonmarital sexual partners than men, as well as more stable longer relationships.

This is in line with the idea that in general men “swagger” (i.e., exaggerate their sexual activity), while women are “secretive” (i.e., underreport sex).

Structural factors such as social norms shape men’s and women’s perceptions of appropriate sexual behaviors.

Society expects men to have more sexual partners, and women to have fewer sexual partners.

According to the sexual double standard, the same sexual behavior is judged differently depending on the gender of the (sexual) actor (Milhausen and Herold 2001).

Interestingly, men are more likely to endorse a double standard than women.

In the presence of sexual double standards, males are praised for their sexual contacts, whereas females are derogated and stigmatized for the same behaviors, “He’s a Stud, She’s a Slut.”

Research suggests that lifetime sexual partnerships affect peer status of genders differently.

A greater number of sexual partners is positively correlated with boys’ peer acceptance, but negatively correlated with girls’ peer acceptance.

As humans, self-serving bias is a part of how we think and how we act.

A common type of cognitive bias, self-serving bias can be defined as an individual’s tendency to attribute positive events and attributes to their own actions but negative events and attributes to others and external factors.

We report on sexual behaviors which are normative and accepted to protect ourselves, and avoid stress and conflict.

That will reduce our distinction from our surroundings, and will help us feel safe.

As a result, in our society, men are rewarded for having a high number of sexual partners, whereas women are penalized for the same behavior.

The only long-term solution is the ongoing decline in “double standard” about sexual morality.

Until then, researchers should continue questioning the accuracy of their data.

Computerized interviews may be only a partial solution.

Increasing privacy and confidentiality is another partial solution.

By Shervin Assari. This article was reproduced from The Conversation

(418 VIEWS)

Don't be shellfish... Please SHARE
Google
Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin
Email
Print

This post was last modified on April 4, 2017 5:48 pm

Page: 1 2 3

Charles Rukuni

The Insider is a political and business bulletin about Zimbabwe, edited by Charles Rukuni. Founded in 1990, it was a printed 12-page subscription only newsletter until 2003 when Zimbabwe's hyper-inflation made it impossible to continue printing.

Recent Posts

Zimbabwe worried ZiG is appreciating too fast?

Zimbabwe, whose currency declined 80% this year before being abandoned, is now worried about its…

April 19, 2024

ZiG confusion

Zimbabwe’s new currency, the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG,) continued to firm against the United States dollar…

April 19, 2024

US congratulates Zimbabwe on its 44th anniversary, but maintains sanctions on the country

United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken has congratulated Zimbabwe on its 44th independence anniversary…

April 18, 2024

Did you know that if America’s billionaires were considered a country they would be the third richest nation in the world?

The 813 billionaires in the United States have a total wealth of US$5.7 trillion. If…

April 17, 2024

Mnangagwa spokesman says there is nothing to celebrate about latest US move on Zimbabwe sanctions

President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s spokesman George Charamba says there is nothing to celebrate about the United…

April 17, 2024

Two British aristocrats target one of Zimbabwe’s biggest lithium assets

Over drinks back in 2019, two British tycoons, Algy Cluff and Michael Spencer, agreed to…

April 16, 2024