Categories: Stories

Is it true that EU sanctions on Zimbabwe are targeted at only two people and one entity?

European Union ambassador to Zimbabwe Timo Olkkonen has been at pains over the past few days to explain away EU sanctions on Zimbabwe.

He says EU sanctions on Zimbabwe apply to only two individuals, former President Robert Mugabe and his wife, and one company, the Zimbabwe Defence Industries.

These sanctions, he argues, have therefore nothing to do with the present economic crisis in the country and are definitely not hurting the ordinary Zimbabwean.

While a number of Zimbabweans agree with the EU ambassador, one must ask whether some heads of 16 Southern African countries are so daft as not to realise that sanctions are only affecting two people that they can declare a day to protest against sanctions on Zimbabwe.

In fact, a statement from the EU following SADC’s decision calling for an end to sanctions because they were not only affecting Zimbabweans but the region as a whole is telling.

The statement said: “The EU is not imposing economic or trade sanctions against Zimbabwe. The EU shares the opinion expressed by a number of international organisations whereby the main cause of the serious social and economic crisis which Zimbabwe is experiencing should be sought in inappropriate economic policies, the manner in which the land reform has been carried out, the drought and the HIV/AIDS pandemic;

“The measures adopted by the EU, as a result of the breakdown of the rule of law and human rights abuses, are the freezing of personal assets of senior members of government and other high-ranking officials, the prevention of the same to travel to EU Member States and the embargo on the sale of arms. None of these measures could affect or cause any hardship to the Zimbabwean population.”

But the third point was quite revealing. It said: “the suspension or re-orientation of certain financial and development cooperation programmes with the Government of Zimbabwe is mainly due to the fact that it has not complied with the provisions of the pertinent bilateral agreements and to the political and economic environment which is not conducive to development cooperation with government structures.”

Can one really argue that this does not affect ordinary Zimbabweans? That is only affects Mugabe and his wife and the Zimbabwe Defence Industries?

As one black comedian, Eddie Griffin, says: “Think. It aint illegal yet. But they are working on it.”

(151 VIEWS)

Don't be shellfish... Please SHARE
Google
Twitter
Facebook
Linkedin
Email
Print

Charles Rukuni

The Insider is a political and business bulletin about Zimbabwe, edited by Charles Rukuni. Founded in 1990, it was a printed 12-page subscription only newsletter until 2003 when Zimbabwe's hyper-inflation made it impossible to continue printing.

Recent Posts

US loses its place as most influential power in Africa to China

The United States lost its place as the most influential global power in Africa last…

April 27, 2024

Zimbabwe central bank chief says street forex dealers cannot destabilise the ZiG

The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe governor John Mushayavanhu says street money changers who cash in…

April 26, 2024

Zimbabwe International Trade Fair plans to turn exhibition centre into commercial complex

The Zimbabwe International Trade Fair (ZITF) has announced an ambitious long-term plan to turn the…

April 25, 2024

ZiG falls against US dollar

Zimbabwe’s new currency today fell against the United States for the first time since its…

April 25, 2024

ZiG plays havoc on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange

Zimbabwe’s new currency has wiped out a more than 330% gain on the stock market…

April 24, 2024

Jonathan Moyo tells Mushayavanhu to stick to monetary policy and leave money changers to the police

One bane of recent public discourse in Zimbabwe is not only that it is never…

April 23, 2024